Chicago City Council's involvement with
Iroquois Theater timeline
In 1903/4 Chicago's City Council was made up of seventy
members. This webpage discusses those who played a role in
the theater legislation before and after the Iroquois Theater fire.
Warning
This is long and tedious. Some
day I'll edit and condense but for now it's an aldermanic bucket.
I also confess to a lack of objectivity about a few of these guys. Some held strong, determined to
produce an ordinance that would make Chicago's theaters safer, even if it
meant dragging theater owners kicking, screaming, threatening and sobbing into
compliance. A few aldermen, however, became stooges for the theater
owners, privately assuring them of protection from an overzealous ordinance, enabling
continued operation of fire traps with far worse safety conditions
than had been present at the Iroquois.
October 10-14, 1903 — during a special
Council committee graft investigation (of the building department as well as
the fire, health, boiler, street and police departments, the attorney's
office and board of local improvements) a Chicago contractor,
Milton Bushnell, claims he lost a theater
remodeling contract because of building department graft. According to
Bushnell, to get a building permit for the theater required the use of a
building process sold by a deputy commissioner in the building department
(Timothy O'Shea who subsequently resigns) and construction by an alderman
(William Mavor). Chairman
of the graft investigation committee, alderman Ernest
Herrmann, reports to
Chicago mayor Carter Harrison that theater owners are taking advantage
of the woeful disorder and lack of coordination between departments in the
building department, licensing department and city clerk's office to bypass
building and licensing codes. The building department issued permits but did
not perform follow up inspections to verify adherence to such conditions as
seating capacity. The building department asserted that was the
responsibility of the license department, who held the city clerk's office
responsible for the job. (The lack of coordination between departments
would be well evidenced during the coroner's inquest when testimony from
John F. McCarthy, a collector in the city licensing department, revealed
that the Iroquois operated without a license for twelve days, Nov 23, 1903,
to Dec 5, 1903.)
October 16, 1903 —
mayor Harrison orders Chicago building commissioner
George Williams
to conduct a "rigid examination" of Chicago's theaters, stating, "Any
place where lives are at risk will have to make the necessary improvements
for safety or close up. If the changes cannot be made the closing up will
have to take place, anyhow." Williams assigns two staffers to
perform a methodical inspection of Chicago's theaters.
October 19, 1903 — building commissioner
Williams recommends amendment t mayor Harrison
that section #181 of the city's building ordinance relative to the
proscenium wall to permit steel studs and metal lath covered with cement
plaster as an alternative to brick or tile. The amendment would bring
that portion of Chicago's theater ordinance into alignment with a court
ruling and standards allowed in other Chicago ordinances, specifically those
covering tenements. Williams points out that in March 1898 when the Council
wrote #181, stud/metal lathe was still experimental but for fire protection
is now considered comparable to brick. Mayor Harrison passes Williams'
recommendations on to the City Council who vote to amend the ordinance
accordingly. In conjunction with that discussion Alderman
Edward Novak introduces a resolution that the mayor appoint a special
committee to amend the theater ordinance and the Council votes to instruct
the building department to temporarily suspend enforcement of theater
building codes relative to second-floor theaters and proscenium arches.
Novak's resolution is sent to the judiciary committee.
October 30, 1903 — building commissioner Williams reports that his
department's investigation of Chicago theaters is complete and reveals that
every theater in the city is violating ordinances. The report will be
submitted to mayor Harrison on Monday, November 2, 1903.
November 2, 1903 — mayor Harrison submits
Williams report to the City Council. The report
shows that based on inspections by his department the last two weeks in
October, every theater in the city is violating multiple ordinances.
The Iroquois is not yet open thus is not included on the list. It will
open in three weeks. The Council sends the report to the judiciary
committee.
November 7, 1903 —
Chicago Eagle newspaper applauds Williams's report and blames the
mayor for collecting an annual salary of $10,000 and not enforcing theater
ordinances.
Tue. November 10, 1903 — Council sends the Williams report to a subcommittee
of its judiciary committee. Subcommittee member Linn
H. Young takes report home to read.
Mon. November 16, 1903 — alderman Young thinks the Williams report is
significant enough to merit distribution to the Council and requests
authorization to purchase printing services to produce copies for
distribution to the Council.
Mon. November 23, 1903 — Williams's report is sent to the printer for
duplication. The premier opening of the Iroquois Theater takes place
tonight.
Tuesday, November 24, 1903, to December 30, 1904 Iroquois Theater in
operation, staging 45-1/2 more performances
Tue. November 29, 1903 — City Council receives 500 copies of the Williams
report. (Had copies been distributed to Council
members by courier, and a special session called that same night, and had
every theater on the report been closed the following morning, it would not
have prevented the disaster because the Iroquois did not open until twenty
days after compilation of the report. One of many circumstances
contributing to the perfect storm.)
November 30, 1903 - December 30, 1903 ordinance revision stalls in a City
Council committeeCouncil is not idle, is working on a streetcar and vagrancy ordinances
and was conducting a graft investigation.
Wed. December 30, 1903 — Iroquois Theater fire
Thu. December 31, 1903 — a group of seven aldermen is one of many groups to
tour the Iroquois the day after the fire. From
the Iroquois, the aldermen go to the city building
department to speak with deputy building inspector
Louis Stanhope,
then on to the mayor's office. The seven:
Ernst Herrmann,
Winfield Dunn, John Jones,
Henry Eidmann,
Luther Friestedt,
Peter Wendling and John Minwegen.
Fri. January 1, 1904 — alderman William Mavor tours theater with mayor and building department
commissioner Mavor (who has only 43 more days to live).
Sat. January 2, 1904 — two more alderman tour the theater, Michael C. Conlon and
Charles Alling, discussing their observations with
Iroquois architect
Ben Marshall and industrialist Charles Plamondon (whose daughter
Charlotte Plamondon escaped the fire).
Sun. January 3, 1904 — the mayor throws down a gauntlet, closing thirty-five Chicago theaters until
they comply with Chicago ordinances, whatever the ordinances may be, as
determined by the City Council. He threatens to do the same with
hospitals, churches, factories and stores.
Mon. January 4, 1904 — Council
forms a committee of seven to investigate the Iroquois fire and draft a new
or amended theater ordinance, made up of aldermen who are builders or
contractors. An important resource is the
Chicago Tribune study. John H. Jones is chairman; other committee
members are Michael D. Dougherty,
William H. Ehemann, Luther P. Friestedt, William Mavor,
William T. Maypole andPatrick J. O'Connell.
Alderman not on the theater ordinance committee have ideas, too; many, however, will lose their resolve over the
next seven months.
-
John J. Bradley proposes that any theater found to have a locked or
obstructed door loses its license or pays a $200 penalty, of which half
is awarded to whoever reports the problem.
-
Winfield P. Dunn proposes making acceptance of theater or railroad
passes by municipal employees a dismissible offense. Council
members laugh.
-
Thomas M. Hunter proposes inclusion of theater management's names on
playbills, outward opening doors, door signage, a steel fire curtain,
sprinklers,
and that a city official examine places of amusement before
and during each performance.
-
William Johnson proposes that the city purchase the theaters.
-
James C. Patterson proposes allowing only one balcony.
-
Lewis D. Sitts proposes a Council committee reconsider an 1899
ordinance regarding crowding in theaters.
-
Vincent Jozwiakowski proposes that theaters pay $4 per performance
to the city for police officers and firemen at every performance, plus
admit five additional policemen free of charge as extra guards.
-
Charles Woodward proposes a requirement for steel or iron fire
curtains with a city fireman and police officer watching raising and
lowering before and after every performance and legislative prohibition
of enforcement delays.
-
Michael Preib suggests the committee should investigate requiring
adult guards and guides at every exit.
-
Silas F. Leachman proposes more exits from both stage and
auditorium, a fireproof curtain, a ventilator on stage, policeman and
fireman at every theater for every performance, prohibiting combustible
scenery and 9-ft sq. stage doors.
-
Alfred D. Williston proposes theaters seating over 500 persons should have automatic
apparatus to open and close doors, controllable by levers near exits, as
well as controls for electric lights.
January 5, 1904, 2:30 pm —
City Council's new theater ordinance committee meets for the first time,
excluding the public because builders fear retaliation from theater owners
in future building projects. The committee warns theater owners that
reopening might be three weeks away. The committee expresses
willingness to hear from theater owners about ordinance content but not
petitions for early opening. Among petitioners who walk away unhappy
is Philo A. Otis of the Thomas Orchestra. Its $3,200-$3,400 weekly payroll
and a month of advance ticket sales mean it will have to disband performers
after thirty days. Thomas S. Kernan at the Bush Temple of Music describes
the changes being made there to comply with the old ordinance, including
stage flues. The weekly payroll for its ninety-two workers is $1,900.
Billie Cleveland, formerly a manager of the Ohio Polite Minstrel troupe,
says he spent all his money remodeling the
Cleveland Theater (a structure built in 1883 to display a panoramic
painting of Gettysburg). Cleveland insists the closing means there is
no revenue with which to remain in business. (Billie later emerges as rather
unpleasant and a review of his history suggests money shortage claims was a
favorite tool.) Owners of The People's Theater saw to the addition of
five exits six months before.
The committee seeks input from attorney
Edgar Tolman and other experts, including architects Louis Sullivan and
George Beaumont, engineer Edward C. Shankland, contractors Joseph Downey,
Addison E. Wells, Charles Gindele and Victor Falkenau. Shankland
and Wells are also members of the
Chicago Tribune investigatory group. Newspaper predict the
new ordinance will eliminate the sprinkler mandate because theater owners
unanimously agree they are unpredictable and cause audiences to panic.
Sprinkler-induced panic becomes a common objection from theater owners.
McVicker's, the Grand Opera and Powers theaters will require substantial
structural changes to comply with the new ordinance.
Wed January 7, 1904 — the theater ordinance committee inspects steel fire curtain at The Auditorium
preparatory to considering the matter of time consumption, 1-3 minutes, to
lower a steel curtain. The committee works until 10:00 pm and
throughout the next two days.
Sat January 10, 1904 —
ordinance drafting committee submits a new ordinance for the Council's
adoption.
Many details of the new ordinance appeared in the Chicago Tribune on January
10, 1904. If the Council adopts it, a majority of Chicago theaters
can open with restrictions, providing exits, seating and auditorium lighting
requirements are met. The plan gives existing theaters until Oct 1, 1904, to
bring the stage area into compliance, if extra police officers, firemen and
fire extinguishers are present. Few theaters will be able to open their
third-floor galleries for at least a month due to requirements for fireproof
exits from galleries and pitch reduction. New theaters will require
fireproof construction and existing theaters will in many cases require
extensive remodeling. Predictably, some theater owners find the
proposed ordinance to be reasonable; others have immediate objections.
Peoples Institute objects to the steel curtain because the weight, 12,000 to
20,000 lbs, will require rebuilding the proscenium wall.
Aldermen Ehemann and O'Connell voice their opinion that the proposed ordinance is too restrictive. Others
criticize the ordinance as too lax. Aldermen Alling, Young and Werno
said they would not vote for an ordinance permitting an auditorium above
sidewalk level. Alling will soon exhibit a willingness to vote for any
measure desired by theater owners. Comparisons with the old ordinance
lead to some useful hole patching but are of limited value since the old
ordinance was not unenforceable.
January 11 - January 14, 1904 — the Council votes against the ordinance, despite a visitors section packed
with hissing and jeering theater workers, citing discussion of over a
hundred amendments as evidence the ordinance is not ready for enactment.
Permitting existing theaters to operate up to seventeen feet above sidewalk
level and separate balcony exits are primary points of contention.
Various aldermen accuse the ordinance committee of having succumbed to
pressure from theater managers. Aldermen Raymer and Eidmann reject
what they see as watered-down legislation. Ordinance committee members
meet until early morning hours trying to find a solution acceptable to the
membership.
January 15, 1904 — the Council
agrees to refrain from voting on the new ordinance for a week so the theater
ordinance committee can consider over a hundred amendments from aldermen.
Alderman Alling withdraws his resolution to immediately permit limited
openings.
A group of theater owners meet and informally agree they prefer the Chicago Tribune investigative report
becomes law rather than the ordinance drafted by the City Council.
January 16 - 17, 1904 — retail
merchants and organized labor pressure aldermen to accept and pass the
ordinance. Restaurants, hotels and unions of bartenders, stage workers
and musicians are among the most vigorous protestors.
January 18, 1904 — Newspapers report that Flo Ziegfeld is considering linking up with Charles Frohman and
William Brady to sue the city over losses sustained by canceled shows (Ma'mzelle
Napoleon, The Pitt and The Silver Slipper). Ziegfeld spoke
of his friendly relationship with Klaw & Erlanger and his insider knowledge
that the Illinois Theater (managed and co-owned by Will J. Davis, Iroquois
manager) had complied with all requirements thus should open. Apparently, no
one told Ziegfeld that at that moment there wasn't a theater law in Chicago
with which to comply. Will Davis later takes a more public position of
opposition to the new ordinance. The man had no shame. The soil
over the graves of his nearly six hundred victims was still freshly turned as
he busied himself trying to coerce the Council into penning an ordinance
that would allow him to continue operating death traps. Too strong?
Nah, am letting it stand.
January 19, 1904 — With the
visitors area of the Council chamber full and hundreds waiting outside,
ordinance chairman Jones calls up the new ordinance for discussion and the
group starts through it, one section at a time. The audience cheers
and applauds speeches opposing restrictions and hisses when Raymer speaks up
for the public interest. Find myself wondering how many of those were
Iroquois employees and if Davis played a role in their presence in the
Council chamber. Do I think he would have paid people to attend and
behave like jackals, or lead them to believe their employment would be
secured if they did so? You betcha. Mayor Harrison does much
gaveling to order. Overall, Charles Alling and
Edward Cullerton emerge as toadies for the
theaters, Mavor champions his committee's recommendation and Raymer and
Eidmann hold strong to protect the public by keeping teeth in the ordinance.
At midnight the group takes a half-hour lunch at the
Sherman House.
As part of the process, the Council
reviews petitions from special interest groups, including the Chicago
Restaurant Keepers Association and the National Alliance of Bill Posters.
Alderman Johnson proposes creation of a committee to prepare a bill for
submission to the state legislature that would authorize Chicago to own and
operate theaters. The membership vote against his suggestion.
The final version of the ordinance
passes with a vote of forty-five to eight at 3:45 am. The ordinance reduces
the permissible rise between tiers of seats in balconies from twenty-five to
eighteen inches. Open space must surround auditoriums or enclosed fireproof
passages with a width no narrower than eight feet. The bottom-most seat on
the ground floor in existing theaters in the Class V category cannot be
higher than twelve feet above sidewalk level and in balconies there must be
a cross-over aisle between every nine rows of seats (despite conflicting
views on the matter from architects Sullivan and Beaumont). Steel fire
curtains beat out asbestos. Other requirements: sprinklers above and
below stage, fireproofed scenery, electronically and manually controlled
vents, working standpipes, fire alarms on all floors, twice-weekly fire
drills, adequate lighting in auditorium, including a red light at exits with
battery backup, and city-paid policeman and fireman at performances.
The new ordinance gives theaters
until August 1, 1904 to complete requirements of a permanent nature, such as
reconstruction of galleries to change the pitch and add exits. To
receive a temporary permit to reopen just their ground floor, they must have
a steel curtain, sprinklers, fireproofed scenery, stage venting, fire
alarms, aisle widths, fire apparatus and police/fire staffing. The Council
forms a committee ito inspect and grant these temporary permits, composed of
the building commissioner Williams and aldermen Jones, Friestedt, Ehemann,
Minwegen, Werno and Eidmann. The council passes
Frank I. Bennett's amendment, the "Bennett Resolution," requiring
alderman Raymer's suggested $25,000 bond from theaters who apply for the
temporary opening permit, and giving the Council theater committee authority
to grant permits to existing theaters based on customized agreements,
effectively overriding everything else in the ordinance.
Alderman Freeman K. Blake of the 26th ward voiced the
obvious problem with Bennett's amendment: "If it is found that some
theaters can't comply with the ordinance, then special legislation would
allow them to open anyway. If they can be made safe, that may be well
enough, but this "special legislation" will nullify the ordinance. I think
the ordinance ought to go to the corporation counsel for an opinion."
Theater managers and owners predict
they will have to double ticket prices to cover remodeling costs. I
spot-checked in 1905 and found no evidence of increased seat prices.
Later theater owners say that some aldermen told them the ordinance would
not pass so they did nothing until the deadline was upon them.
-
The Auditorium Theater - manager Milward Adams reports it is able to
reap the rewards of its original million dollar construction fifteen
years prior because it is already configured and equipped to comply with
a majority of the new ordinance requirements. It need only increase the
size of vents above the stage and install sprinklers. Adams
nonetheless later becomes active in an attempt to water down the
ordinance, becoming indignant when a father who lost his daughter in the
fire dares to suggest theater owners are more concerned about money than
lives.
-
Academy theater - plans to spend a month installing a steel curtain
and sprinklers, rebuilding the proscenium wall, removing two hundred
seats and reconstructing the gallery
-
Alhambra Theater - James H. Brown met with city officials
-
Avenue Theater - apt to close
-
Bijour Theater - will install a new proscenium wall, steel curtain
and sprinklers, and remove 240 seats
-
Bush Temple Theater - manager Thomas F. Kiernan says it will take
three months and $12,000 to install a steel curtain, sprinklers,
standpipes and fireproof scenery
-
Cleveland's Theater - to comply must widen aisles and exits, install
steel curtain and rebuild proscenium.
-
Criterion Theater - manager Lincoln J. Carter says will make repairs
-
Garrick Theater - J. J. Shubert estimates remodeling will take three
months to install a steel curtain
-
Glickman's Theater - will install a steel curtain, replace the
proscenium wall, add flues, fire extinguishers and a fire alarm
-
Grand Opera House - owner Harry Hamlin says they will have to
rebuild entirely.
-
Great Northern Theater - manager G. E. Raymond says cannot meet
ordinance requirements
-
Haymarket Theater - will close or remodel its gallery to reduce the
pitch, remove seats to add aisles, install sprinklers, a steel curtain
and new exits
-
Hopkins Theater - manager John Fennessy feels his house is already
safe the cost of fixing the noncompliant gallery pitch and exits, and
installing sprinklers and a steel curtain, may force closure.
-
Howards Theater - owner Lorin J. Howard said he cannot make the
changes to become compliant
-
Illinois Theater - anticipates reopening in two to three weeks, in
time for an E. H. Sothern attraction, after installing sprinklers and a
steel curtain, with increased ticket prices to make up for closing its
steeply sloped 338-seat gallery
-
LaSalle Theater - S. J. Franks met with city officials
-
McVicker's Theater — will install steel curtain and sprinklers, its
gallery pitch already in compliance
-
Masonic Temple Theater — Needs to reduce seating capacity to fewer
than 500
-
New American Theater — John Conners met with city officials
-
New Marlowe Theater — R.L. Crescy of the Marlowe says he'll probably
have to close
-
Olympic Theater — will rebuild
-
People's Institute — treasurer Edward McGuire estimates a $7,000
expenditure and three months to bring the facility into compliance
-
Powers Theater - will abandon the balcony and reopen in four to six
weeks
-
Sam Jack's Theater - manager Signey C. Euson did not want to discuss
the theater's problems with reporters. The theater height exceeds the
allowed maximum of twelve feet and is not fireproof. Rebuilding is the
only solution
-
Steinway Hall Theater - manager E. Christy says he might convert the
theater to offices
-
Studebaker Music Hall - manager Ed Fish says alterations are in
progress
-
Thirty-first Street Theater - apt to close
-
Trocadero's Theater - Robert Fulton said they need to install
sprinklers for $3,400 and a steel curtain for $1,400.
January 20, 1904 — mayor
Harrison feels that if other requirements are met, the city should allow
theaters to open immediately then add sprinklers and make permanent
alterations by August 1, 1904. Reportedly the four sprinkler firms in
the city employ only 100 workers, too few to add sprinklers to Chicago's
theaters within the three to four week time frame the mayor and Council had
in mind to get the theaters back in operation. Harrison calls together
the aldermanic theater ordinance committee (Jones, Friestedt, Ehemann,
Minwegen, Werno and Eidmann) and theater managers.
January 21, 1904 — the graft commission halts its investigation before getting to inspection departments
in municipal departments. After meeting with theater managers members
of the Council theater commission (Friestedt, Ehemann, Jones and Minwegen)
are persuaded that sprinklers are unnecessary because after all the other
provisions for the stage are met, there will be nothing on the stage to
burn. The weight of water tanks for the sprinklers, estimated by
theater managers to be 80 to 100 tons, will require structural changes.
Theater owners complain a monopoly on sprinkler
installations drives the price up by 25% and involves a 30-day delay.
Sprinkler contractors purportedly involved in the monopoly are:
-
General Fire Extinguisher Company 169 Jackson
-
Manufacturers Automatic Sprinkler, 153 La Salle
-
Niagara Fire Extinguisher, 226 La Salle
-
Kellogg, Mackay & Cameron Company, 220 Lake Street
-
J. F. Brass, 218 La Salle St.
|
January 23, 1904 - the Council's theater commission recommends amendments to the new ordinance.
They define a steel curtain as one that can withstand heat up to 1,500
degrees for ten minutes on the stage side without causing the auditorium
side heat to exceed 500 degrees, controlled by two independent mechanisms.
The deadline for sprinkler installation, along with permanent alterations,
is extended from August 1, 1904, to September 1, 1904.
January 25, 1904 — Friestedt
now asserts the steel curtain is also too much of a burden on the theaters
and threatens to resign from his position as alderman if the Council does
not alter the ordinance according to his wishes.
January 26, 1904 — the Council
votes to retain the steel curtain requirement and to the extension to Sept 1
for major changes. Instead of resigning, Friestedt backpedals and
issues a position clarification statement.
January 30, 1904 — Chicago
theaters slowly move toward compliance as a committee of alderman perform
inspections and demand changes. At the Illinois Theater, former sister
theater to the Iroquois, reopening requires bricking up windows that open
onto fire escapes, installation of additional aisles on main floor and
removal of iron doors. Davis must close the third-floor gallery because, as
was the case at the Iroquois, the pitch is too steep. Other theaters also
fail to pass their first inspection. The
Robert W. Hunt
company is testing fire curtains and providing affidavits to the
building department.
February 8, 1904 — William
Mavor, one of the most influential members of the Council, suffers a stroke
during a finance committee meeting. Within minutes he is unconscious
and does not regain consciousness again before his death on February 12,
1904.
February 17, 1904 — the
Council votes 31 to 14 to let Cleveland's Theater open without rebuilding
its proscenium wall. This is the first of two special accommodations
granted to Cleveland's.
February 25, 1904 — the mayor
decrees that police officer theater assignments apply to the entire day's
performance, not just matinees, and prohibits between-act breaks. The
ruling comes in response to a deluge of applications for matinee assignments
from "good looking" officers, the implication being that female audience
members interested applicants as much as wages. That might suggest a
high proportion of women in all afternoon matinees, not just those during
holidays.
February 27, 1904 — fire
insurance expert
John Freeman completes his
eight-week study
of the Iroquois fire and has
bad news for the Council's new theater ordinance. Stage vents are
too small and operation mechanisms inadequate, with little wonder: Chicago
based its ordinance on a New York ordinance that New York discarded twelve
years prior. Fireproof paint and hand grenade extinguishers are
useless and some of the steel curtains being installed will not perform
properly in a fire.
February - March, 1904, — Six
hundred dead didn't prevent some theaters from trying to flout the law. The
LaSalle Theater added fourteen seats beyond its capacity and evaded many
requirements by avoiding the use of moveable scenery (the absence/presence
of which was a distinction commonly used in municipal code to designate
theaters with a higher risk of fire).† The Thirty-First Street Theater
reopened with too many seats, poorly designed stairs, no brick proscenium
wall or asbestos curtain and an unsafe gallery. Schiller Hall needed to
change the direction of an exit door and add two stairwells. Drill Hall in
the Masonic Temple needed to add a stairway. Sam T. Jack's had nearly double
the number of seats allowed, too narrow aisles and corridors and stairways,
too few exit signs, no asbestos curtain or brick proscenium wall. The
worst offender was the Columbus Theater that continued giving the bird to
enforcement for nine months (see January, 1, 1905).
Police close down Hedda Gabler
at Steinway Hall at the end of the first act for operating without a
license, sending home an audience of four hundred.
Many theaters are circumventing fire
safety requirements by substituting curtains and flaps for moveable scenery
thus qualifying the theater for reduced fire safety standards insofar as the
steel curtain, aisle width, number of exits, etc.
June 20, 1904 - the Theatrical
Managers Association submit eleven amendments to the theater ordinance to
the City Council. Theater managers demand:
-
To eliminate the requirement for
separate street-level entrances for each floor in the theater so that
floors can share common stairwells.
-
A standard minimum width
established for entrances, regardless of the seating capacity of the
theater.
-
To strike the word "directly"
from the passage about aisles, permitting scissor stairwells such as
those at the Iroquois.
-
To eliminate sprinklers
altogether.
-
To increase the number of seats
permitted per row from ten seats to thirteen.
-
To eliminate all cross aisles on all floors.
-
To permit a reduction of seat bank depth from thirty-two inches to thirty inches.
-
To reduce the minimum seat width from twenty inches to eighteen.
-
To increase the maximum rise
between tiers in balconies to twenty-four inches instead of eighteen
(thereby allowing the pitch to return to within one inch of the
Iroquois).
-
To remove all requirements for emergency exits, outward opening and fireproof doors.
-
To permit gas, oil or electric
exit lights.
Alderman Jones supports the
theatrical managers, saying that the ordinance, drafted soon after the
Iroquois fire, reflected the heat of emotion and put too great a burden on
theaters. He apes theater owners in claiming that sprinklers are a
menace to life because if they go off accidentally the audience will think
there is a fire and panic. (Don't forget that according to many in 1903, the nearly six hundred
victims at the Iroquois Theater committed something akin to mass suicide by panicking.
Mayor Harrison, the Iroquois Memorial Association and aldermen Sitts,
Jozwiakowski and Schmidt are among those opposed to the manager's demands. A
week later comes a petition to completely redraft the ordinance, using
experts paid for by the theaters. No conflict of interest in that
plan, LOL. Some theater managers have already spent thousands of dollars
bringing their houses into compliance so understandably oppose a new
ordinance. Among them: Powers, McVicker's, Grand and Garrick. $100,000
was the estimate for remodeling McVicker's. Petitioning for a new
ordinance are Bijou, Academy, Alhambra, Olympic, Chicago Opera House,
Haymarket, Criterion, Trocadero, Hopkins, LaSalle, Sam T. Jack's, New
American, People's, Calumet, Columbus, Illinois (Will J. Davis' theater) and
Great Northern.
July 1, 1904 - A trio from the
Theater Managers Association addresses the City Council theater committee to
lobby for a new ordinance more favorable to theaters. Among the group:
Will J. Davis, the man most responsible for the Iroquois fire. After
an hour of discussion about the costs of remodeling,
August Marx rises. He had lost his daughter at the Iroquois.
"I want to protest against any changes in the ordinance. In the name of
the 600 mute graves, blamable upon that almost unmentionable accident that
happened recently, I want to protest. The theaters acknowledged that the new
ordinance was all right by giving bond under it. The public goes into the
buildings at the invitation of the managers, and is the duty of the managers
to see that the people come out again in safety. I have been here an hour
and a half and the talk has been all of dollars and cents. I have not heard
one word regarding the value of human life."
"I resent that statement, Mr. Chairman," interrupted Milward Adams of The
Auditorium. "That is not the spirit of the Theater Managers' Association,"
said Davis. The theater owners put on a show of indignance, making not
so much as a nod of acknowledgment that it was the gross incompetence of one
of their trio that resulted in nearly six hundred deaths.
July 11, 1904 - Council's
theater committee grants a six-month extension to McVickers to install a
gallery exit in an adjacent building when its lease runs out and it becomes
available.
July 12, 1904 - the theater
committee considers ordinance relief requested by theater managers, assisted
by architect George Beaumont and engineer William S. Mac Harg, appointed by
mayor Harrison to provide technical advice. The modifications under review
include eliminating the sprinkler provision, cross aisles and reducing the
pitch in galleries. The group concludes that for clarity the ordinance needs
to be split between requirements for existing theaters versus those for
theaters built in the future. Building commissioner Williams and
Ehemann resist attempts to weaken the ordinance while Jones, Werno, Eidmann
and Dougherty, along with consultants Beaumont and Mac Harg support the idea
of creating a separate watered-down ordinance for existing theaters.
Assistant corporate counsel William H. Sexton‡ interceded to prevent Ehemann
from resigning.‡
July 14, 1904 — yet another
committee gathers, this one consisting of building commissioner Williams,
aldermen (presumably Jones, Friestedt, Ehemann, Minwegen, Werno and Eidmann),
architects Beaumont and William Holabird (1854–1923), as well as theater
managers Milward Adams from The Auditorium and Harry Hamlin of the Grand
Theater. They hash out ordinance modifications to the requirements in the
ordinance package with a Sept 1 deadline for existing theaters.
-
Sprinklers are only required in
painting, carpentry, storage and dressing rooms. Adams asserts
sprinklers are unnecessary with fireproofed sets and curtain, and that
sprinklers positioned 60-70 feet above the stage would be too high to be
triggered until the fire was out of control, and if they open
accidentally they would destroy sets costing as much as $50,000, forcing
theaters to carry sprinkler damage insurance. (Adams was one of those
who became indignant when accused of focusing on money instead of
lives.)
-
Vents need only operate via
electricity, dual electric/mechanical operation having caused problems
in a theater where tried. So if the fire takes out the electrical
power, as happened at the Iroquois, there will be be no way to open the
vents.
-
If two firemen are present, police are not necessary.
-
Power for Exit sign lighting can
be electricity, gas or sperm oil.
-
The city electrician and his
assistant, as well as police, fire and building department heads are all
granted the right to enter theaters.
-
The allowable rise between
seating tiers in galleries can be up to twenty-two inches (only three
inches less or about 10% of the gallery at the Iroquois).
-
Space required between rows is
reduced from thirty-four to thirty-two inches.
-
The modification allows a maximum
of thirteen seats per row on the main floor and eleven in galleries.
-
Direct exits may consist of
tunnels or cross aisles.
July 18, 1904 — the amendments pass as discussed in committee but not without a fight from Jones, Allings
and a shouting Cullerton who wanted sprinklers eliminated altogether,
accusing alderman Blake of operating as a mouthpiece for underwriters who
are pushing for sprinklers despite their history of damaging inventory.
Before Cullerton and Blake come to fisticuffs Mayor Harrison interrupts and
calls for a vote. The amended ordinance for existing theaters,
including the sprinkler requirement, passes 52 to 3.
July 21, 1904 — Mayor Harrison
signs the ordinance.
August 12, 1904 - Theater Managers Association petitions mayor for yet another extension of the
deadline for ordinance compliance, from Sept 1 to to Nov. 1. The
deadline had originally been set to Jun 1 so a November deadline would
represent a five-month extension. The theaters who have whined loudest
since January 1904 are the ones whining loudly eight months later.
Harrison sends the request to the theater committee of the Council. A
Chicago Tribune editorial in the August 14, 1904 issue cites the leniency
already given the theaters and relates the story given by some that they
delayed making changes because of promises from aldermen that amendments to
the ordinance would make changes unnecessary. "One would like to
know who were the city officials and aldermen who were playing to the
galleries in January by demanding a rigid theater ordinance and were at the
same time giving private assurances to the amusement people that the
ordinance would be toned down later on. " "If the theater owners really were
deceived by promises which they had reason to believe meant something, give
them the extra time they ask for, but no more, and see to it that all the
alterations required by the ordinance are thoroughly made." "Let there be no
more tinkering of the ordinance to save theater owners' expense. They have
been treated with great leniency." Amen.
August 15, 1904 — pushed
through, predictably by Jones, the Council granted theaters a two-month
extension. Amendments by Eidmann and Raymer cause the $25,000 bonds to
be forfeited if alterations are not made and require theater managers to
sign agreements that they will close their houses if not compliant by Nov 1,
1904.
October 28, 1904 — new theater ordinance altered to allow landings
every thirteen and a half feet instead of every eleven feet, to accommodate three theaters.
|