Keyword search
(Iroquois-specific results
will appear at bottom of
search list):
Note: If this tab has been open in your browser for hours
or days, a new search may bring an access error or unproductive results. When that happens, position the cursor in the
"Enhanced by Google" search box above, then refresh your screen
(F5 on PC, Cmd-R on Apple, 3-button symbol at top right of screen on Android or iphone) and
re-enter your search words.
Charles W.
Allen (1846 – 1911) of Kenosha, Wisconsin* survived the Iroquois
Theater fire without injury. It is not known who attended the
matinee with him but he traveled to Chicago from Kenosha several
times a month and may have been accustomed to solitary theater
excursions.
Out of the fire and into brother's frying pan
This crazy long and complicated rabbit hole story involves the Iroquois Theater only slightly.
It covers a tumultuous decade in the lives of the Allen family of Kenosha. Charles
Allen survived the fire but the next eight years, his last, were
filled with turmoil that involved labor strikes with shootings,
the sale of the family business after years of resistance,
scandalous arrests of his wife and then his brother for gem smuggling,
finished off with his final minutes spent plunging fifty feet
through the air to his death. Chapters in the life of the Allens:
With their three children, Charles and his wife,
Ella French Allen (1850 – 1927), descended from
pioneering families in Kenosha, Wisconsin. Their
children were Charles jr, Robert and Gertrude.
Family business
With his younger brother, Nathan R. Allen jr.
(1855 – 1924), Charles Allen was the wealthy co-owner
of a large family-owned tannery. The N. R. Allen
Sons tannery had been co-founded in 1856 by their
father, Nathan R. Allen, and a group of other
Kenosha men. Nathan sr had located in Wisconsin
in 1835, coming there from the Fulton, NY area. Charles
was brought into the company in 1870 and Nathan jr
in 1878. It was sometimes described
as the largest independent tannery in the world. It
originally focused on harness leather but by 1910 was
known for glove leather. When the Allen family sold
off their majority holdings in 1906 for $7.5 million
it became one of 101 plants in the Central Leather
trust, employing 1,200 workers.
Nathan sr and Mary Hale Allen
had nine children. Of their first six, five were sons. Of
those, three died in infancy, including Nathan's
first namesake. Two of their four daughters died before their
fortieth birthdays.
At her death in 1912,
ninety-two years old and widowed for nearly two
decades, Mary Allen was survived by only three of
her children but she thought there were four.
She died thinking that her
oldest boy Charles
still lived and was unaware that her youngest boy,
Nathan, her late husband's namesake, who in 1906 had
been a trustee at
Northwestern University and had in 1907 given $12,000 to
Kemper Hall, a Kenosha college, had for two years
brought attention, ridicule and shame to the
family name with headlines in hundreds of newspapers
throughout the country.
Enough of this gig
In
1909, while Charles negotiated with labor unions and
strikers protested outside, three workers were
shot. For a time the Wisconsin state militia was
ready to head for Kenosha. To Charles the strike
may have felt like a slap. Eight years earlier,
before selling to the trust, he had voluntarily
increased wages across the board at the plant by
8-10%, making it one of the highest paying tanneries
in the industry. In 1909, however, he no longer had
the unilateral authority to grant similar wage
increases. Perhaps frustration over the uneven
ratio of responsibility to authority contributed to
his decision the following year to retire from the
tannery business.
Tanning in 1905, a year before the Allens sold their plant
There were 1,049 tanning manufacturing companies in the U.S.,
the largest proportion located in
Massachusetts. The N. R. Allen firm
was one of 33 tanneries in Wisconsin. The
industry employed 57,300 workers nationwide,
of which 95% were men. Industry-wide, hide
production of the types likely done at the
Allen plant included 12.3 million calf, 45
million goat and 20 million sheep.
By 1906 the N. R. Allen tannery primarily produced
hides sold to glove manufacturers.
Retirement didn't bring much calm for Charles. In
June 1910 his wife, daughter Gertrude, and two
friends were returning from a five-week European
tour when they were arrested by New York customs for
failing to declare $3,000 - $5,000 in jewelry and
apparel when they disembarked from the Lusitania.
Ella first claimed they had nothing dutiable, then
amended her declaration to $160. Customs officials
began opening their nine trunks and found newly
purchased gowns. The women were given another
opportunity to declare their purchases, but when
they stuck to the $160 story, female inspectors were
called in for a more thorough search. On Ella was
found a $2,000 pearl necklace and a $350 broach. On
the other three were found six pieces of jewelry
valued at $1,000.
Six degrees of separation
One of Ella's travel companions, who was also
detained, was Carrie Briggs Creiger, wife of
Dewitt Creiger jr.
A city official and son of a former Chicago mayor,
DeWitt had been appointed to sort and inventory
belongings of Iroquois Theater victims. He would
also be the last friend to see Charles Allen alive.
(In his 1918 obituary, it was said Dewitt was
related to the Allen family by marriage, but I
failed to find the connection.) Months before his
death, he was traveling in Munich with Robert W.
Allen, youngest son of Charles and Ella, when WWI
broke out. The men were taken prisoner for one day
then released to return to America. Charles operated
the Allen-A Knitting Mills hosiery business in
Kenosha until 1938, then retired to a secluded life
on a 3,000-acre estate in Michigan south of
Charlevoix. He married a woman named Augustine while
in France. At his death in 1949, his estate was
valued at $3.8 million.)
Ella pled guilty to smuggling to judge Holt and paid
a $100 fine ($2,700 today) plus the value of the
jewelry in its country of origin and fifty percent
duty.
In Ella's defense, her attorney said that since it
was her first transatlantic voyage without a man,
she did not know how to report items brought into
the U.S.
Caught in a web
A report on jewelry smugglers apprehended during a
six-week period in the autumn of 1909 in the NYC
harbor revealed that over half were women. Ella and
her friends were caught up in a no-fish-too-small
campaign on the part of a new port collector -
William Loeb jr. (1866 – 1937).
He got the job because he'd been Teddy Roosevelt's
dedicated secretary, but after less than a year of
his excessive zeal
at Customs, President Taft and others began urging
Loeb to run for governor of New York or retire.
So many small fish were clogging their calendars
that at least one judge who heard smuggling cases in
New York during the Loeb years felt compelled in a
ruling to make a point of distinguishing between
amateur and professional smugglers:
"I
will state again my view of what has come to be
known as the anti-smuggling crusade in this city
particularly. To my mind, there is a very great
distinction between those foolish persons, largely
women, and equally foolish men, who, when coming
into this country as passengers, bring upon their
persons or concealed in their luggage some articles
of adornment for personal wear, and smuggling
merchants. Of course, that is against the law, and
therefore it is wrong, but I think that is a very
different thing from a long-continued course of
smuggling for profit; smuggling which is a part of
the mercantile transaction in which it occurs, for
that goes to the root of all honest business," said
Judge Charles Merrill Hough (1858 – 1927)† when
passing sentence on Allen Nathan.
The Allen family was not done with smuggling problems.
In 1911, two years after Ella Allen stepped off the Lusitania,
fifty-three-year-old Nathan Allen, brother of
Iroquois survivor Charles Allen, husband of Canadian
native Ellen Jebb Allen (1871 – 1947), and a father of
three children aged nine to sixteen, was accused of
smuggling $150,000 in jewels, clothing, and artwork.
The last leg in a costly trip to Europe, the crime
came to the attention of Customs when his former
mistress, a gold digger half his age, provided
details to authorities as retaliation for his having
withdrawn his affection and financial support.
Titillation for all
It was a made-for-media situation
with juicy aspects for every predilection. Smuggling,
infidelity, men besotted, a pretty young
adventuress, a wealthy man brought low, talk of an
international smuggling ring, investment bankers,
bank boxes, jewels, a mysterious, tragic death,
luxurious lifestyles, mansions, courtrooms,
avaricious investigators, and conniving detectives.
Crammed into a film, the number of things going on
might make it seem comical. As would be revealed
over many months of newspaper investigations (in a
time when fact-checking was time consuming and data
was still in ledgers and on index cards), Nathan's
infatuation with twenty-year-old divorcee Helen Fuld
Dwelle (alias Helen D. Jenkins and Helen Field)
resulted in his spending roughly a half-million
dollars on gifts and her support over an
eighteen-month period. The gifts included a large
home with costly furnishings, a limousine, lingerie,
pedigreed dogs, bronzes, and a $20,000 wine cellar
(a half-million dollars worth of corks today). The
support included multiple servants and a lavish
lifestyle of champagne breakfasts — all in addition
to Helen Dwelle's real passion — jewelry.
Who were Helen's parents?
Between Helen's distortions and a story so
journalistically hot that it seems newspapers
competed over column inches devoted to it, reporters
were motivated to interject information with little
to no verification. Add typographical errors and what
you have is a mishmash that makes fact-finding a fool's
errand. As the Fool responsible for this web page, I thus
warn you that almost everything said here about Helen Fuld's Dwelle's childhood must be qualified as
speculative. I've tried to note when I can't verify
something with genealogical information or where what
I found is squishy.
Though often described as a native of New Orleans
and a southern belle, Helen was also described as a
child from the east side of New York. It's not
surprising then that some genealogy researchers -
including me for a time - mistakenly connect her to
NY dry goods merchant Seligman Fuld and his wife,
Laura Henry. The confusion is easy because Seligman
had daughters named Helen and Flora, and his Flora
married a man named Sam Levy, as did Helen's sister.
The Seligman Fulds, however, were straight-up folks
who might have shunned a daughter for behaving as
did the Helen Fuld of this story, rather than
continuing to include her in family gatherings as
did Seligman's family with their Helena.
Additionally, Seligman Fuld did not have a daughter
named Martha or Pauline, and their daughter Flora
was never referred to as Flueretta or Florence.
Finally, after about forty hours of reading many
dozens of newspaper stories over six years,
1906 – 1912, I came across a story in the June 30,
1911 issue of the Leader-Telegram newspaper
in Eau Claire, Wisconsin, that gave clues to help me
track down THIS Helen's origins.
Her parents, German immigrants, Solomon Fuld
(1833 – 1875) and Fannie (probably Francis) Adler Fuld
(1845 – 1906), met and married in Munich before
emigrating to America, said Helen. Her father was a
teacher of languages in New Orleans. (Thus far, I've
found nothing to corroborate that claim.) Her
mother's maiden name was Adler (not Adams as was
reported in a few newspapers and given as the maiden
name of one of her daughters at the time of death).
Fannie Adler Fuld's father was Alexander Adler, a
dentist to the "old Duke of Saxony," so said Helen.
According to genealogy records, before settling in
the south in the 1870s, the family lived in
Baltimore, where Solomon worked as a photographer.
Helen had five sisters. One, Jenny Fuld Mayers, was
the wife of a prominent businessman and politician
in New Orleans — who probably kept as far away from
Helen Fuld Dwelle as possible during the scandals.
Nothing is known about another of the sisters,
Pauline. The girls' mother, Fannie, lived with
Jenny's family in 1900. Three of Helen's sisters
played a role in her scandals:
Flurette Florence L. Turnell (c1873 – 1950) was
the wife of Charles A. Turnell, an attorney for
the Chicago & Northwestern Railway. In a 1910
newspaper interview Charles Turnell emphatically
expressed his/their estrangement from Helen,
stating they hoped to never see her again.
Florence told a newspaper reporter that Helen's
tale of Florence having been present when she
first met Nathan Allen was totally untrue.
Florence traveled to Europe at the same time as
Helen and may have been the sister who
accompanied Helen's party on the shopping spree
there. Florence and Turnell separated briefly in
1910, and they cited the Helen scandal as the
cause. The marriage ended in divorce sometime
after 1920. When marrying Turnell, Florence gave
her maiden name as Adams, and one newspaper
reporter quoted Charles as having said that
Adams was Helen's actual maiden name. Adler:
Adams. No cigar but close. After Florence's
divorce from Turnell, she married a man named
Weston, giving her mother's last name as Adler
and her father's as Fuld. Maybe Florence was
married to a man named Adams before marrying
Turnell? Or maybe Fannie remarried a man named
Adams after Solomon Fuld's death? It was common
then for offspring to unofficially adopt the
last name of a stepfather.
Anna Fuld Mitchell Levy, wife of Samuel M. Levy,
seemingly Helen's closest relative. Anna / Annie
and Sam were on hand to attend Helen's wedding
to Adolph Davis, though it didn't come off.
Helen claimed to have sold the mortgage on the
Bell house in NYC to them.
Martha Fuld testified before the federal grand
jury that she was along on the trip with Helen
when Nathan took them to visit and
touch the Tiffany pearl necklace. Helen later
claimed to support two of Martha's children but
refused to name them. I found no evidence that
Martha married, but that doesn't mean she didn't
have children. Given Helen's propensity to play
fast and loose with the truth, she could have
had a half dozen children.
Helen asserted that her mother died of a broken
heart in December 1906 and, according to Helen, it
was Helen's fault. More on that later.
Lee Allen Dwelle was a short-term victim.
Sometimes Helen's story was that she'd run away from
home to follow an unidentified jockey on the racing
circuit, but I've not found any elaboration on her
jockey years. Not for lack of trying. A surprisingly
complete background story makes no mention of a
jockey. She reported that while she and her mother
were traveling, she met a handsome young man with
whom she slipped off to marry in Windsor, Canada,
ten days later. Helen said it was in October 1901,
but her husband said it was in 1898, and he is more
apt to be correct. Aside from habitual carelessness
with facts, during the burglary/smuggling
controversy, Helen wanted to be perceived as a young
innocent.
In Helen's words, "He
was 26, handsome, and a graduate of West Point. His
father was the owner of a big line of lake steamers
that piled between Sandusky, O, and Detroit." Not so much. Lee Allen Dwelle (1872 – 1942) was
twenty-nine and a graduate of the Peekskill Military
Academy in New York, not West Point. The shipping
concern of his father, Benjamin Franklin Dwelle
(1818 – 1903), consisted of fishing boats, a ship
chandlery, and a tugboat named The
Erie.
(Benjamin was also a co-owner of the land upon which
would someday be built the Cedar Point Amusement
Park but he died and the property was sold long
before the appearance of roller coasters or corn
dogs.)
Rather than following in his father's footsteps, Lee
chose instead to become a passenger and freight
agent, first for the Nashville, Chattanooga, and St.
Louis railway, then for the Louisville & Nashville
railway, a job that required travel four to five
days a week. His child bride was left at home with
relatives, sometimes by herself. They lived with
Lee's parents in Sandusky, other relatives in
Detroit, and in Chicago in January 1902 at 4622
Indiana Ave. One day Lee came home to find Helen
gone. She said his mother didn't like her. (That's
the only statement of Helen's I can believe with a
fair degree of certainty.) After her first
desertion, Helen returned to live with Lee in
Chicago until April 1902 for a short while at 55
University Place. He left her after twice returning
home from the road to find her living elsewhere. He
gave her money to return to her mother's home in New
Orleans.
Lee was granted a divorce from
Helena Dwelle on November 26, 1902, after presenting
evidence to judge John Gibbons in Chicago that his
bride of two years had improper relations on four
specific dates with two men: Frank Arms and Henry F.
Bennett.
Olive Gallie and Margery Littlejohn at the
Potomac apartments house
testified, saying that Gallie rented a suit to
Helen, who identified herself as "Mrs. Frank Dwelle." Gallie later learned it was Frank Arms. Littlejohn,
a hotel maid, said Helen introduced Arms to her as
her husband. Littlejohn served breakfast to the pair
every day for a month. (If so, Dwelle's description
that he was traveling for his job 4-5 days a week is
suspect. Did he leave Helen without means for
sustenance? Was her infidelity actually a means of
survival?) To Lee's divorce suit, Helen filed what
was described as a "general denial" through her
attorney's, Fry & Hyde, but she did not appear in
court to defend herself.
Helen lived with Frank Arms for two months after the
divorce from Lee Dwelle, then returned to Memphis
and John Collins. One reporter who interviewed Helen
later described Lee as "plodding," probably an apt
description of her opinion of her first husband. A
year after their divorce, Lee filed for bankruptcy.
No way of knowing if Helen contributed to his
financial problems, but it seems possible. Most men
who came into Helen's life left it with emptier
pockets. (There were two men named Frank Arms living
in Chicago in 1902. One of them was a skilled
billiards player. No clue if that was Helen's
Frank.)
First sugar daddy, John R. Collins
The most low-profile participant in this story, John
R. Collins (1858 – 1954), was described by Helen Fuld
Dwelle as a lifelong friend of her family, an
intimate friend of her late father, Solomon Fuld. (I
failed to find corroboration of this in newspapers.)
So trusted was he by her mother and sisters, Helen
claimed, that they let him adopt her as a ward when
she was a freshly-divorced fifteen-year-old.
Reportedly Collins sent Helen to St.
Agnes Academy in Memphis to
study music for nearly two years. In Helen-speak,
that probably meant closer to one year. Helen never
saw a lily she could refrain from gilding. While
attending St. Agnes, she reportedly boarded with a
prominent unidentified family on upper Beal St.
After St. Agnes, from about 1904 &nash; 1906, Helen and
Collins traveled around the United States. In a 1910
interview, she made a point of saying they'd had
separate hotel rooms, perhaps forgetting that during
1906 trial testimony, she'd admitted she had lived
with Collins as man and wife during that period.
What is known about John Collins?
Collins was the oldest of ten children born to James
F. Collins (1826 – 1891) and Mary B. Metcalf Collins
(1833 – 1907), of which only four survived as of 1900.
His father had been a farmer in Hartford, Kentucky,
where John and most of his siblings grew up.
John Collins began his career at Render, KY coal
mines, later transferring to Central Coal and Iron
in Central City, KY. By 1893, he was in charge of
the Memphis office, and in 1897 he founded Southern
Coal. At his death, Southern Coal had ten offices
from Chicago to New Orleans as well as two mines in
Delmar, Alabama, with homes in Chicago and Memphis.
Collins had two daughters the same age as Helen —
Annabel and Catherine, born in 1885 and 1887. They
were the daughters of him and his late wife,
Catherine Hardwick (1859 – 1890), who died
unexpectedly of tuberculosis. Aged three and five at
the time of their mother's death, the girls
afterward lived with John's mother in Hartford, KY,
Mary Metcalf Collins, while John worked in Memphis
and visited when he could. When Helen Dwelle spoke
in 1910 of John's family turning against her, she
may have referred to Annabel and Catherine.
A year before Collins hooked up with Nathan and
Helen, he was selling acreage in Hartland, KY,
possibly to raise money for Southern Coal. In the
never-to-be-known category is the question of
whether John Collins' involvement with Helen Fuld
Dwelle and Nathan Allen was founded primarily on
lust for Helen or on Nathan's fortune. (At the
moment, I favor Nathan's fortune but gimmie a while
to think on it, and I may change my mind.)
Greener pastures
Helen left Collins in 1906 for
Adolph Davis (see panel below) just
as she'd left Dwelle in 1902 for Collins and would
leave Collins again in 1909 for Nathan Allen, all
three times trading up to a man who could give more
and better presents.
After the Davis engagement fiasco in 1906, Helen
came back to live with Collins in Memphis rather
than returning to New Orleans to live with her
mother, who reportedly pled with her to do so. Helen
later said she rebuffed Fannie's entreaties out of
embarrassment at having brought shame to the family
name in 1906.
Helen said she blamed herself for having killed her
mother, recalling a dramatic story. Helen said she
called her mother on December 23, 1907 (wrong year —
Fanny died in 1906), and they were having a
pleasant telephone conversation when her mother
dropped the receiver, too tired to continue talking.
According to Helen, Fannie laid down to rest and
died in a half hour. Emotional response was
commonly accepted as a cause of death in the early
1900s, with grief, shame, heartbreak, anger, and
fear among the oft-named murderers.
Red velvet swing
With Collins funding probable, Helen purchased a
cottage at 180 East St. in Memphis and named it "Cozy Cottage"
Reportedly she spent
$20,000 having mirrors installed on floors, walls, and
ceilings, along with a red velvet swing.
It sounds so suspiciously like antics attributed to
actress
Evelyn Nesbitthat I'm left wondering if Helen was a Nesbit wannabe or
if enterprising journalists goosed the stories. It
is interesting to note that in 1913 when many of
Helen's household furnishings were sold at auction
to settle debts, Evelyn
Nesbit was one of the largest bidders.)
Helen's preference for wearing an abundance of
jewels, labeled vulgar by some acquaintances, earned
her the nickname "Queen of Diamonds." She refrained
from making an indignant objection when one reporter
repeated the characterization of her as an
adventuress, so perhaps Helen enjoyed that image.
The name Jenkins was altogether fictional, derived
from a character in a novel read by John Collins.
Reportedly he applied it to Helen playfully, then
she, he, and Nathan later adopted it whenever an
alias was needed. An inside joke amongst the trio.
Once again, Collins introduced her to a new beau.
Collins needed capital for Southern Coal, his
retail/wholesale coal business in Memphis on Madison
St. His banker introduced him to Nathan Allen, who
was flush with cash from the sale of the tannery. To
Nathan Allen, Helen was introduced as John's sister.
For the role they had in mind for him - that of a
financier for Helen's rich lifestyle and John's coal
mine — it would not do for John to be seen as a
rival for Helen's affections. According to some
reports, John and Helen showed Nathan a grand time
in Memphis when he visited there to discuss
investing in Collins' coal dealership. Helen
admitted she'd felt obligated to Collins for his
kindness to her in the early days of their
relationship (c.1902 – 1905, St. Agnes Academy, etc.),
so urged Nathan to invest heavily in Southern Coal.
Nathan fell hard for the girl and apparently
recognized that money and presents were the way to
Helen's heart. According to Helen, he slid $300 in
her handbag one night at dinner then every day
thereafter.
After two weeks of Nathan's generous wooing, Helen
told him she was soon leaving for New York to begin
studying to become a nurse. Nathan insisted he would
come to New York and help. At the Hotel Astor in NY,
she later claimed to have been shocked that he
booked only one room. Per Helen, he then showered
her with so many diamonds and jewels that she agreed
to give up the idea of nurses training and instead
became his mistress in Chicago.
Helen's later recollection was that their romance
began when Nathan was irresistibly drawn to her
beauty and showered her in orchids.
House on Sheridan Road in Chicago
In Chicago, she went by Helen Dwelle Field, letting
people assume she was related to the Marshall Field
family. Her maiden name, Fuld, was sometimes
Americanized to Field, but I've not found evidence
of a familial relationship between Helen and
Marshall Field. She stayed at the Stratford Hotel,
where she was visited weekly by a man introduced as
Mr. Jenkins, who could have been Collins or Nathan.
Whoever it was, the hotel staff preferred Helen's
tips to those from Mr. Jenkins.
In December 1908, Nathan bought a three-story red
sandstone house at 6330 Sheridan Rd. for Helen, as
well as a $14,000 automobile and a hired French
chauffeur to go with the car. Some reports said the
house cost $35k, others $50k (about $1 million
today) with $22,000 to $25,000 additional for
furnishings ($600k today). Two years later, in
August 1910, Helen sold the house to Nancy E. De
Spain for $23,000 plus the assumption of a $15,000
mortgage.
Excessive accessorizing with jewelry and expensive
gowns continued to be Helen Dwelle's calling card.
John Collins frequently stayed with her in the house
on Sheridan Rd. and Nathan visited weekly. Helen
would later claim to have had ten of them then,
including two Japanese males, a French chef, and a
French maid. They later recalled smiling and
giggling behind Nathan's back when he exchanged
pleasantries with Helen's dear brother John.
Shopping spree in Europe
On April 21, 1909, a party of six to eight boarded
the
Kronprinzessin Cecilie headed
for Europe. For the next two months, Nathan Allen,
Helen Dwelle, John Collins, and four servants — a
maid, cook, butler, and chauffeur — traveled through
France and Switzerland. One of Helen's sisters,
possibly Florence Turnell, was along on the trip
until early May 1909. Much of their travel was in a
limousine, stopping at hotels and celebrated
restaurants, purchasing baubles, gowns, animals, and
household décor as they went. There must have been a
second car for some of the servants and luggage; too
many people and belongings to fit in a single
automobile. While most newspaper reports described
John Collins as traveling with Nathan and Helen, a
few said he traveled separately but met up with them
regularly.
As their tour neared an end, Nathan and Collins are
said to have devised the smuggling scheme, with
Nathan taking the lead. Other reports attributed the
strategy to Nathan's investment banker, Jules Bache.
Either way, it doesn't jive with the image Helen
presented elsewhere of Nathan as an old family man
in a worn blue suit. Was he anxious to impress his
new friends? Was Helen's description of Nathan's
appearance inaccurate? Was he caught up in the
giddiness of discovering a new side of himself?
A $10,000 pearl was said to have been concealed on
Nathan's person when they landed on June 25, 1909,
and he told deputy surveyor Joseph Sulzbach they had
nothing dutiable. Nathan would testify in October
1911 that he paid $50-60 to each of three customs
inspectors for winking when he brought $10,000 of
jewelry and apparel into the U.S. without paying
duty, telling them he would be staying at the Hotel
Wolcott (other newspapers said it was the Breslin
Hotel, in rooms 621-2). That evening one of the
customs officials showed up to collect the bribe.
(Other newspapers told a less likely story that four
to five customs agents came to call on Nathan that
night, not only to collect their bribe but to
exchange the actual smuggled goods). Nathan later
confessed to having smuggled $64,000 in all,
including a $1,700 diamond pin, the Tiffany necklace
(purchased at Tiffany's in London, not at Tiffany's
in Paris and for $33,000, not $100,000 as published
in newspapers and claimed by Helen), along with two
pearl earrings for $5,000 each, two unset pearls for
$9,000, a necklace for $3,500, as well as $6,800
worth of watches, sapphires, laces, and clothing.
Later that year, in October 1909, Nathan made a
second trip to Europe, this time with his wife and
children. Reportedly, during the second trip, the
Tiffany necklace was returned, and a second more
costly necklace was purchased and claimed upon
reentry.
One newspaper later suggested, possibly after
priming by Charles and/or his attorney, that the
reason Charles's wife, Ella Allen, had been arrested
in 1910 was because Customs was already on the alert
and looking for Nathan, but that seems unlikely. If
that were so and customs was so keen to catch him,
how did they then miss
Nathan when he disembarked from the Lusitania with a party
of seven people, fourteen trunks and pet cages? Not
exactly slipping quietly into the port. Bringing to
mind another tale, told by customs special agent
Richard Parr, that customs head William Loeb was
coincidentally on the pier when the Allen group came
through.
Nathan's absences and
changes in behavior had, of course, not gone
unnoticed by his wife, children, and siblings. His
brother, Charles Allen, saw large bank drafts,
presumably from joint business accounts, and knew
something was seriously amiss. Confronted, Nathan
had no choice but to fess up to Charles and his
family. Nathan was reluctant, however, to believe
that his sweetheart Helen Dwell and financial bud
John Collins were only interested in his fortune.
Nothing was said about Nathan's state of mind at
having his bubble popped, but I think he must have
been wounded and embarrassed. I'm also thinking,
though, that Charles, and maybe Nathan as well,
feared Nathan would return to Helen in a heartbeat
if she crooked her finger. Belief in a woman's
witch-like capacity to mesmerize was popular in the
early 1900s. Nathan seems to have relied on his
older brother Charles to learn the truth about Helen
and then to help extract him from the relationship.
The age difference between Charles and Nathan is important
due to what took place during the nine years before
Nathan was born. Charles was six to seven years old
when the first Nathan Allen jr. was born and died.
For sure, Charles knew too about another dead
brother, William, who had died in infancy before
Charles was born. Charles was eight when the third
Allen boy, Henry, died at birth or soon thereafter.
That's three dead sons in ten years. By the time
Nathan Allen jr #2 came along, everyone in the
family, including nine-year-old Charles, would have
felt ultra-protective of Dad's new namesake. As the
oldest son, taking care of little brother Nathan was
as much part of Charles's responsibility as was
taking leadership of the family's tannery business
when he became an adult and assuming control of it
when their father died. When the tannery was sold,
it was Charles who stayed on and remained
responsible for daily operations. Though the tannery
wasn't Charles's only business activity, after
retirement, he had time on his hands. Fixing
problems and taking care of the family was his job,
and I suspect he took hold of Nathan's problems with
verve.
Charles's first step as Nathan's fixer was to hire a
detective agency to learn more about Helen and John
Collins. The next step was to hire an attorney, W.
S. Forest of Chicago. Then came emptying the joint
bank deposit box shared by Nathan and Helen. Lastly,
and maybe the most important step of them all, was
to move Nathan beyond the reach of Helen. Nathan and
his family were first furloughed to a family
vacation home in Montana and, in October 1909, sent
to Europe.
We've got this
In the fall of 1909,
Charles and Nathan probably assumed they would be
able to retrieve some portion of the monies Nathan
had spent on Helen. Charles liquidated the contents
of a joint bank safety deposit box at the Illinois
Trust bank in Chicago that Nathan had set up for
Jenkins. The box contained an oil painting they'd
purchased at Knoedler's in Paris by Adolf Shreyer,‡
The Cavaliers (shown above), a pair of pearl
earrings, a pearl and diamond necklace, 162 shares
of stock in John Collins coal company, Southern
Coal, that Helen appraised at $500 each, totaling
$81,000 ($2.1 million today), and promissory notes
totaling $45,000 ($1.3 million today) that John had
issued to Nathan as surety on Nathan's investment in
the coal mine and that Helen claimed Nathan had
given her. Nathan's attorneys would later report
that Helen owned only one of the Southern Coal
shares, purchased for $500.
Romance ends
Around September 1909, the Helen-Nathan-John trio became estranged,
probably due to Charles's intervention. Helen left
Chicago and the house on Sheridan Road and moved to
NYC. (She sold the house a year later.)
On July 1, 1909, she took
occupancy of apartment #203 on the eighth floor at
the Hotel Lorraine in New York City, a suite
consisting of a drawing-room, bedroom, bathroom, and
private hall. It was a small hotel just two years
old at the corner of Fifth Avenue and 45th street,
about a block north of Delmonico's restaurant,
accommodating about twenty apartments. Surely she
did not still employ three servants in such a small
space. She began calling herself Mrs. John W.
Jenkins. Her removal to NY and adoption of Collins's
first name as a husband point to her relationship
with Nathan coming to an end and resumption of her
intimate relationship with John Collins. Collins,
however, soon became as unwilling as Nathan Allen to
pick up her tab and was seen in the company of the
private detectives representing Nathan.
Had Charles put an end to an
investment in Collin's coal mine or threatened to do
so? Did Collins finally realize he wasn't the love
of Helen's life, just the longest-running chump?
Perhaps while watching Helen operate on Nathan's
wallet as she sashayed through Europe, John
recognized that he and Nathan were wearing
exchangeable shoes.
Enter Mary Russell
A mutual friend, William S. Foultz (1851 – 1912)§, of New Castle, PA,
introduced Helen to a Yonkers lady, Mary L. Smith
Russell (1866 – 1934). Around the time of their
twentieth wedding anniversary, Mary and her husband,
William A. Russell (1863 – 1930),** had had an
argument, and Mary went to stay at the
Waldorf-Astoria hotel until William apologized.
Helen offered a sympathetic ear and persuaded Mary
to move in with her at the Lorraine hotel where the
rooms, said Helen, were larger and better appointed.
For a month, the new
BFFs enjoyed companionable trips to the opera,
sumptuous dining, and automobile excursions. It is
interesting to note that Helen was not so trusting
of Mary as, to tell the truth about her relationship
with Nathan, instead of telling Mary that Nathan was
her wealthy husband who was traveling in Europe. Mary helped Helen with her correspondence, including
letters to two children in Chicago (that Helen would
later claim were nieces, daughters of her sister
Martha) and several to Nathan Allen's bankers to
plead for money. Charles and the attorneys were
doing a good job of preventing Helen from having the
opportunity to lure Nathan.
Eighteen months later, Helen
detailed her first meeting with Mary. She said that
Foultz invited her to join him and a friend, Mary,
for lunch and a drive. When Mary became chilly they stopped at Helen's
apartment to get a wrap for Mary. Foultz remained in
the car while Helen and Mary went inside (of course,
else Foultz might have been an inconvenient witness
to contradict Helen's story). Mary began crying
about her marital problems and lack of money, so
Helen invited her to move in. During the subsequent
month, Mary's children sometimes visited. Helen
invited them to stay for dinner and purchased a
couple of gowns for the girls. The children said
their father was far too angry to reconcile with
Mary.
The friendship between Helen Jenkins and Mary
Russell crumpled under the weight of a robbery
investigation. On Saturday, December 11, 1909, Helen
went out for the afternoon and did not return until
5:00 pm. Mary did not join Helen on her outing but
did leave the apartment twice during the afternoon.
Upon Helen's return, as guests arrived for tea,
Helen found her dresser drawers in disarray and
realized the leather case containing her jewelry was
missing. Helen claimed to have
then called the hotel manager and asked him to
contact the police. When he refused, she called
Pinkertons and told her guests of the robbery. Some
of them called their friend, an assistant district
attorney, and he called the police department. When
quizzed, Helen estimated the value of the collection
at $300,000, making it one of the largest jewelry
thefts in NYC over the past many years. Her
apartment soon filled with detectives,†† including
lieutenants Braun/Braum, Hyams, captain McClusky and
inspector McCafferty from NYPD, as well as Pinkerton
detective George
S. Dougherty (1865 – 1931).
According to Helen, Dougherty shared his opinion
with her that her friends had stolen her jewels.
Several years after the robbery, Dougherty became
convinced that Helen's jewels were stolen by a hotel
thief named Rogers, but nothing more was said about
that theory.
After learning what Mary told investigators, Helen
chose to interpret Dougherty's assessment as an
indictment of Mary Russell. Inspector McCafferty had
a different take on things, however. Though
investigating officers and Lorraine hotel personnel
were instructed not to discuss the case, McCafferty
eventually told the press that a "thorough and
rigid" investigation was continuing but not into a
robbery and that the value of the jewelry was
less than half the sum reported. It took about 20 seconds for the press to read
between the lines and report
that the burglary was suspect. Over the next few
days, more newspapers covered the story of a faked
burglary than had covered the story of a supposed
actual one.
History shines brightly on Dougherty's career, but
in the case of Helen's jewels, the legendary
Pinkerton detective may have been another male taken
in by Helen's beauty and charm. NYPD conducted a
lengthy interrogation of Mary Russell, a
forty-three-year-old woman described as pretty but
plump. Armed with ample examples of Helen's
financial problems, Mary gave her opinion that Helen
was broke and had pawned the jewelry, including one
instance in which Helen had asked Mary to pawn a
piece of her jewelry, then inserted the pawn ticket
in a letter to Nathan's bankers to strengthen her
case that she needed money. Mary also later told
police that she had seen Sutherland at the Lorraine
Hotel on more than one occasion in the weeks just
prior to the burglary. NYPD concluded the absence of
forced entry was not an indication that Mary had
left the door open when she left the apartment that
afternoon but evidence that a theft had not taken
place. They noted too that Helen had removed her
jewelry from the hotel safe and had for several
months chosen to instead keep them in her room, that
she had not called the police to report the crime
when the hotel manager refused to do so, and that
she refused to supply a list to the police of
acquaintances who had visited and had access to the
jewelry. She hired an attorney in New York, Robert
C. Morris, and later reported that John Collins and
Pinkerton detective Dougherty were annoyed by her
doing so.
My guess is that Helen reported the pawn as a theft
out of vanity to explain why the Queen of Diamonds
was suddenly so distressingly bare of jewels.
Disinterest from the police subsequent to Mary's
interrogation, with perhaps an indiscrete word from
Dougherty to Helen about the gist of Mary's remarks
to the police, led to Helen implying to newspaper
reporters in January 1910 that the thief was a
society woman from Yonkers. That veiled accusation
fooled none of the parties involved and led to a
newspaper interview with Mary and William Russell,
by then reconciled. The result was that details
about Helen's financial woes were exposed that might
otherwise have remained hidden in police notes.
Along with Mary's opinion of Helen's lack of
education and garish tastes. In the tit-for-tat
newspaper mudslinging that ensued, Helen found the
opportunity to tell newspapers that she grew tired
of Mary's unrefined ways and had asked her to do so
four days before the robbery. Helen tucked in the
missive that some of her sophisticated friends had
declined to include Mary in social activities (thus
explaining why Mary was not with Helen the afternoon
of the burglary — making her suspect #1). That
surely angered Mary, but she'd sunk a deeper arrow,
I think, with her description of Helen's desperate
financial situation and scheming. The tone of
newspaper stories began to change a bit about this
time, with increasing references to Helen's
duplicity and less acceptance of Helen as a victim.
I wonder what Helen hoped to get from Mary when she
invited her to move in. She claimed her motivations
were entirely altruistic, but that would be out of
character. All evidence points to Helen having been
an opportunist. Maybe she had her eye
on Foultz's pockets and thought Mary would increase
the opportunities for contact with the banker.
Could Helen have been planning a pretend heist weeks
in advance, recognizing that if all suspicion was to
be diverted from herself, she needed someone else
living in the apartment to accidentally leave a door
open? Is it possible that Nathan's detectives
(Sutherland) and/or John Collins were in on the
theft?
Jewelry recovered
Charles hired the Mooney & Borland Detective
Agency‡‡ in Chicago, and a divisional manager,
William J. Sutherland (c1863-1936), was assigned to
the case. Helen later told a newspaper reporter that
so and that when the story of the theft appeared in
newspapers he'd send a dozen telegrams offering his
assistance in recovering the jewelry.
According to Helen,
Sutherland urged her to fire the Pinkerton
detectives and hire him instead, which she did. She
dismissed a
claim by Mary Russell that Sutherland was seen
lurking about the halls at the Lorraine Hotel a week
before the burglary. It appears Helen was aware of Sutherland's association
with the Allen family and Collins but did not see
his assisting her as a conflict of interest. Helen
claimed that she, NY Lieutenant Braun/Braum, one of
her sisters, and her attorney, Morris, traveled to
Chicago to identify her jewelry, where they were
joined by John Collins. They went to Sutherland's
home, where Sutherland and Collins urged her to
accept a settlement and end the robbery
investigation. The group then went to Mooney &
Boland to identify the diamonds. There were loose
stones in the collection, and stones were missing
from the settings. According to Helen, Sutherland
said they would need to retrieve the missing stones
from a man named Koshock who had purchased them for
$4,500, a price Helen considered far below their
value. To connect with Koshock, they would have to
employ a law firm headed Williy, one who knew how to
reach Koshock's lawyer, a man named Davis, to whom
they would have to pay 10% of the value of the
stone.
As Sutherland told the story, with the release
signed by Helen, he had then engaged William B.
Soule of Soule Secret Service to make the actual
retrieval. Four of Soule's detectives (Rohan, Kehoe,
Bock, and Barry) set up surveillance in a hotel room
adjacent to that of the primary suspect, Charles
Rosenthal, at the Saratoga Hotel. The detectives
bided their time and eavesdropped until they
overheard a conversation involving a jewelry
transaction. The detectives broke into the room and
arrested Rosenthal as well as Paul Korshak and his
brother-in-law, Jay Harris. Korshak and Harris were
twenty-five years old. Nearby was a table strewn
with jewels and notes with math calculations.
Twenty-five diamonds were recovered from Rosenthal
and rings from Korshak. Harris admitted most of the
notes were his. Rosenthal denied theft but admitted
to being on parole, having just served a three-year
sentence for a 1908 burglary in Elmira, New York.
Some newspapers later reported that Rosenthal was
the man who stole the jewels from Helen's apartment.
He was said to have been working as a waiter at a
restaurant in New York City, the Little Hungary Cafe
on East Houston St., that Helen often frequented.
Helen drank too much wine, and the restaurant owner
told Rosenthal to escort her home in a cab. A few
days later, he went back and took her jewelry case.
He then made connections with the Chicago dealers.
Korshak said he dealt in
enlarged crayon portraits and jewelry. His
brother-in-law, Harris, lived in Detroit and had
only recently come to Chicago from Palm Beach, FL,
to work for Korshak at the crayon portrait studio.
Korshak's brother, an attorney, posted his Paul's
bail. Paul followed Max's advice and refused to
discuss the case further. On Helen's trip to Chicago
with her attorney, Braun, etc., Soule did not press
charges. The case against Paul Korshak was dropped
on March 18, 1910, by judge Crowe and the same was
expected with the cases against Rosenthal and
Harris. Soule bought the jewelry back from the trio
for an unreported sum.
Helen returned to New York and, a few days later,
was notified that the jewelry had been recovered.
She went to the Mooney & Boland agency with
Sutherland, Collins, Morris, and Braun. There were
still lost stones and missing stones. Helen said she
was told that the recovered jewelry had been
appraised at $120,000, and a $72,000 settlement was
agreed upon. From that, $41,000 was deducted to pay
the $12,500 commission to Davis, $4,500 to Koshock,
and expenses. Helen was paid $31,000, and in March
1910, she used it as the down payment on a house in
New York on 86th St. Supposedly judge McEwen (of
Chicago?) then came to Helen's home on 86th and gave
her an additional $1,500 for gems that weren't
recovered.
A story in a Boston newspaper stated Rosenthal cased
the Lorraine, stole the jewelry, kept it hidden in
Philadelphia for three months until interest died
down, then contacted his Chicago sources to find a
buyer.
Bell House of Mystery
The house was a five-story mansion at 39 West
Eighty-sixth Street on
the upper west side of Manhattan, purchased from
Caroline Elebash Harned, wife of Bedell H. Harned
(who was secretary to Frank J. Gould, son of robber
baron Jay Gould), for $30,000 plus the assumption of
a large mortgage. Designed by
John Hemmenway Duncan (1854 – 1929),
Louis Valentine Bell (1853 – 1925) took title in
1901.§§ Reportedly, the Bell house was nicknamed the
Mystery House because there were sliding panels,
hidden rooms, and elevators. Foreclosure proceedings
were started in 1910 when Helen failed to pay a
$10,000 mortgage installment. When authorities
arrived to serve foreclosure notice, they discovered
that Helen had stripped the house of its light
fixtures and sent them to an auction house and
claimed to have sold the house to her sister, Annie
Levy of Portland, Oregon. This is the same sister
who accompanied Helen during her 1906 exploits with
Adolph Davis.
Helen would later recall having a large staff of
servants in the 86th street house, but given her
impoverishment at that point, it is unlikely. After
being evicted, Helen moved often, probably chased by
creditors. In two years, she lived at the Wellsmore,
Great Northern Hotel, Prasada, and Hotel Woodward.
Litigation ever her choice of weapon, Helen sued the
seller of the house, saying that the price asked was
too high.
Meanwhile, the case of the stolen gems had caught the attention of
William Loeb's take-no-prisoners Customs department,
specifically that of one Richard Parr
(1865 – 1921)***, a deputy surveyor. Described as a
secret agent of the government, Parr had previously
drawn attention for his take-down of the American
Sugar Refining Co. (He called attention to the
presence of a spring that caused inaccurate
weights.) Parr may have been eager to again
demonstrate his sleuthing skills and to collect
another large reward from Uncle Sam — he was
reportedly paid a $100,000 bounty in the great sugar
caper. Parr was known to loan money on occasion.
That was his pathway to Helen, who without Nathan's
support was becoming desperate for cash, pawning her
possessions and borrowing money from loan sharks,
trying to repay them at $300/month. Purportedly he
was introduced to Helen by a man named Graff. Parr
initially loaned Helen $1,000 and took her furs as
collateral — a full-length mink, an ermine, and a
sealskin coat, muffs, and fittings. He would later
assert that initially, he was unaware of the
smuggling, and Helen was unaware he was a government
agent. Helen may have been clueless, but as Parr
told the story at other times, he suspected
smuggling the first time he saw the jewel robbery
story in the newspaper. As they became chummy, she
mentioned the smuggling and provided Parr with
enough details to check the duty papers and verify
that only $100 in dutiable items was declared, with
belongings valued at $8,000 before sailing to
Europe. The story went that when he then revealed to
Helen his role at the Customs department, she wept
and reluctantly decided to roll over on Nathan. One
of the many problems with that story is that in
another telling, Parr claimed to have told his wife
all about his pretend-romance with Helen before it
started and to have sallied forth with her
blessings. Wife didn't agree to him romancing Helen
for the return from a mere $1,000 loan. If the wife
knew about the pretend affair in advance, it was
because Parr knew from the outset, or had a pretty
strong suspicion, that there was a smuggling case to
be exploited. When his wife later had a miscarriage,
he blamed it on an anonymous caller who told her all
about his romance with Helen, the romance she
supposedly already knew all about. If there was
anyone in this whole story who told the truth, I
didn't find him or her.
Over the next two years, Parr claimed to have paid off $30,000
worth of pawn tickets for a portion of Helen's
jewelry, clothing, and household possessions. She
would later say that initially, their agreement gave
her the opportunity to repurchase her belongings but
that she had since given him a bill of sale and
waived all rights to the items.
Newspaper descriptions of the smuggled and/or stolen
jewelry varied over the months, but a detailed list
of twenty-eight pieces appeared in a Kentucky
newspaper (see picture) that was probably based on
information supplied by Parr.
The priciest item in the lot was the $100,000 pearl
necklace purchased from Tiffany's in Paris. (That in
later court testimony would be substantiated as a
$33,000 necklace that came from Tiffany's in
London.) Some background on that necklace: Helen
claimed that in London, shortly before their return
to the U.S., they met at the Savoy Hotel in London
with J.S.
Bache of New York, a long-time broker of Nathan's. She
claimed to have given it to Bache along with a
$10,000 pair of pearl earrings. According to Helen,
a few weeks after her return to New York, after she
had asked Nathan several times about the necklace,
he took her to the banking house of J. S. Bache &
Co., at 42 Broadway, to see the necklace and
earrings. Her sister Martha went along, and they
each briefly held the jewelry. Helen said that for
some reason, they were not permitted to take the
jewels away and she had not seen them since. She
thought she should sue Nathan to recover them. She
said Nathan bought a costly pearl necklace and
$10,000 earrings for his wife at the same time.
Helen claimed to have worn the Tiffany necklace only
twice during their European travels. Nathan's
detectives said Helen had smuggled the necklace in
herself though Nathan gave her $10,000 to pay duties
on it. It was documented to have been returned to
Tiffany's before the smuggling case came to trial.
The likelihood of Jules Bache risking everything to
play the role described by Helen seems slim. Nathan
and Charles were good customers of the Bache firm
but not big or important enough to put it all on the
line for petty theft with so many witnesses.
Before the case came to an end, Parr several times
puffed up and told the press about Nathan and Bache
heading a vast $15 million international smuggling
ring that was shared with Bache banking customers
when they imported items to the U.S. When newspaper
reporters contacted Bache for a comment, they were
told that Nathan Allen maintained a large account of
around $1 million with Bache and referred all other
questions to their attorney, Henry Wollman. Wollman
said the Tiffany necklace had been returned to
Tiffany's. Upon further investigation, Parr
reportedly learned that Helen purchased the necklace
from Tiffany's in Paris, but it was paid for by
Nathan in New York and that Nathan then carried it
back to Paris on his October 1909 trip with his
family and returned it to Tiffanys because Nathan's
wife refused to wear it. Go, Ellen! Instead, a
$70,000 necklace was purchased — and claimed at
customs upon their return to the U.S.
Unknowing, Charles's detectives were delighted to
finally be able to report that Helen had a new beau,
just what was needed to bolster Nathan's lingering
doubts about his lady love as a con artist. The
detectives were shocked to learn that her new love
was instead a government agent and that Nathan had a
customs target on his back. It is not known what
conversations then took place between Charles's
detectives and Parr, but they came away from the
discussion with wildly different interpretations.
The conclusion drawn by the Allens was that Parr and
Helen were trying to blackmail Nathan for $1.5
million. The conclusion drawn by Parr was that Bache
and the Allens were trying to bribe him with $300k
to drop the smuggling case. Later Parr and the
detectives would makeup, Parr denying that anyone
offered him $300k and the detectives saying it was
all a misunderstanding.
By October 1911, Nathan had
resigned from the tannery and his bank director
position. He'd been indicted, and for months
newspapers were awhirl with stories about the
upcoming trial. The arrest of Charles's wife for
smuggling in 1910 had, of course, been brought to
the attention of the newspapers. Into it all fell
Charles, literally and figuratively.
He plunged through a dining room roof at the Palmer
House hotel in Chicago after falling, jumping, or
being pushed through a window in his hotel room #497
on the fourth floor fifty feet above, breaking his
neck and other bones, dying instantly. The window,
eighteen inches off the floor, was still open when
it was over. Some reports said he landed in a
courtyard, others that it was in a dining room, and
one said it was in an air shaft.
He had met with his friend Dewitt Creiger near the
noon hour, then headed back to his hotel room with a
headache, deciding not to go back to Kenosha on the
1:00 pm train as planned. He fell out the window
soon after taking receipt of a pitcher of ice water
from a bell boy who later testified that Charles was
last seen sitting in a chair tilted against the wall
by the open window. The open window and ice water
might be signs that it was a hot autumn day. Perhaps
he intended to pour water on his head, stuck his
head out the window, became dizzy, and fell.
Suicide was discussed because Charles had lost
$500,000 in the stock market a few days before his
death. Given his wealth, that doesn't seem a large
enough loss to have made him suicidal.†††
Murder was considered because there was some
confusion in Chicago as to whether it was Charles or
Nathan's body. If Nathan, things became more
complicated because of the pending jewelry smuggling
trial and its suggestion of blackmail.
Murder was mostly dismissed as a possibility when it was
verified the corpse was
Charles rather than Nathan. Had Chicago police known
all there was to know about Nathan's troubles, they
might have looked long and hard at Charles's
enemies. The body was shipped to Kenosha, where the
coroner's jury ruled it an accidental death.
The staff physician at the Palmer House remained
adamant that it was suicide, but the reasons for his
opinion were not reported. Hotel staff disagreed
about whether a chair found on the floor beneath the
body was the chair from Charles's room or a chair
that had been sitting in that same location for
weeks. To the best of anyone's recollection, there
had been only one chair in Charles's room, and it
was still there, but that didn't end the dispute at
the hotel. No one said where the water pitcher got
to.
Charles left behind an estate valued at $5 million
($133 million today). His obituary reported he was
one of the first American golfers and played daily.
I didn't find corroboration of either claim, but he
was one of the founders of the Kenosha Golf Club,
picking up whatever budgetary overages the club
incurred at year-end and did win some golf trophies.
He also owned a trotting racehorse named Brash and
played whist. I came to like Charles while working
on this story.
Mom died wondering why her boys hadn't come to see her in a while
Ten days after Charles's death, Nathan pled guilty to smuggling and was fined
$12,000 ($320,000 today). Collins was fined $4,000.
The government then sued him for restitution, and he
paid another $100,000, Collins another $1,000. At
trial, Helen made a point of mentioning several
times that Nathan had purchased many gifts for his
wife and children that were also smuggled. She found
several opportunities to mention those gifts Nathan
took to his family, even in the initial information
she supplied to Parr. Nothing was reported to
suggest that authorities went to Kenosha to collect
the goods, but it appears that is what Helen hoped
for. In September 1912, Helen took a more direct
whack at Nathan and his detectives and failed. Her
suit for a claimed loss of $218,000 in stolen jewels
and gifts she'd received from Nathan that Charles
had removed from their joint bank box was dismissed.
In pretrial publicity, her attorneys claimed that
her suit would prove that Nathan's detectives sent a female detective into
Helen's apartment at the Lorraine to steal her
jewelry, then later pretended to recover it, while
Charles stripped the bank box of everything, the
whole effort being a conspiracy to ruin her
financially.
Parr and some of his pals who had hoped to cash in
when Helen won her big lawsuit against Nathan were
left having to sell off what remained of her
belongings.
Parr boasted to the press about having made Nathan
pay $116,000 to the government in fines and fees,
but nothing was reported about his receiving a
bounty for his role. Early on, he had stated that if
received, he saw no reason to share it with Helen.
Not surprising. After his receipt of $100k for
discovering a spring in the scale on the sugar
weighing docks, a worker complained to newspapers
that he was the one who discovered the spring while
Parr collected the reward.
In November 1911, the Allen family sailed to Europe,
reportedly to never return. Shortly before sailing,
they buried Mary Hale Allen, aged mother of Allen
and Nathan, who was never informed of Charles's
death or Nathan's legal problems. The Allens did
return to the United States, some to Kenosha and
others to Connecticut. In September 1914, a
Wisconsin tax commission ruled that Kenosha County
could not collect income tax from Ella and her son
because they were no longer residents of the county.
The ruling reduced the county's income tax revenue
by one quarter.
On January 17, 1913, John Collins paid his share of
the restitution to U.S. Customs, the last $875 due
insofar as the government was concerned, and the
smuggling case that had dominated months of news
coverage was officially closed. Later that year, he
married chorus girl Elsa Fleischhauer and set up
housekeeping with her at 5055 Sheridan Rd, not far
from where he and Helen had once pretended to be
brother and sister.
According to Helen, John
Collins and his family washed their hands of Helen
when she implicated him in smuggling. Ya think? In
1918 John's purchase of a home on Sheridan Rd. in
Chicago for $80,000 elicited a brief mention of
Helen's home on the same road. In the 1918 story, it
gave Helen's name as Helen Orvelle Jenkins. The
reporter had obviously not done his homework or
would have known the name Jenkins was fictitious.
When tracked down and asked if he was the John
Collins who had been associated with Helen Jenkins,
Collins first denied that he was the same man, then
let his spokesman — detective William Sutherland –
issue a retraction admitting it was him. At that
time, it was reported that Collins owned half
interest in the Dugan Lumber Company in Memphis, in
addition to Southern Coal.
In September 1913, Helen's former possessions were
sold at public auction by Darling & Co at 6 E. 33rd
St. in New York. The auction
was promoted as offering $500,000 worth of jewelry,
furs, and household effects. Purportedly Helen was
there for the first day, darkly veiled and
unrecognized. The items had been placed with various
creditors, including Richard Parr, and were sold to
collect loans and storage fees. Noteworthy items in
the sale were ivory carvings, fine rugs, and
bric-a-brac. The auctioneer, Louis Van Brink,
predicted great bargains for attendees, with Helen
receiving $75,000 or $100,000, all of it expected to
go to pay Helen's $100,000 in debt judgments to
milliners, corsetieres and others such as Richard
Parr. The first day sales were $5,700. Evelyn Nesbit
Thaw, the originator of the red velvet swing, was
said to be one of the largest bidders, purchasing
portieres, paintings, and curios, paying $250 for a
dining room suite. Other theater people who turned
out to bid were Rose Coghlan, Virginia Norden, and
Sam Harris.
The last newspaper story
about Helen came when her aunt Carrie McBride sued
her for $6,296. Carrie said Helen promised in 1909
that she would have become wealthy enough to support
Carrie for the rest of her life, at $8 per week, to
perform housekeeping, maid, secretarial, and
chaperone services. Carrie said Helen stopped
sending money after an initial $300. Helen wept,
maybe with the first real tears in this story, and
said her aunt was unfit at housekeeping, so Helen
sent her to live with relatives in New Orleans. When
Carrie and the relatives did not get along, Carrie
returned to New York, but by then, Helen had no
money with which to hire her. Carrie admitted that
secretarial services provided were limited to
brushing Helen's hair.
If Nathan had been reading gossip in 1906...
In the summer of 1906, Adolph Davis,
reportedly an owner of gold and silver
mines, met a lovely young woman at a hotel
in Saratoga. She introduced herself as Helen
Fuld Dwelle, a native of Memphis and a
twenty-two-year-old divorcee. She said her
husband, a wealthy steamship owner named Lee
Allen Dwelle from Sandusky, OH had abandoned
her, so she'd divorced him for desertion and
was traveling with her guardian,
John R. Collins.
According to Helen, Davis fell madly in love
with her and proposed marriage when they'd
known one another for only two weeks. He
showered her with roses. Flower showers were
a theme with Helen. In her description of
her first meeting with Nathan Allen, there
were declarations of love and showers of
orchids.
Helen declined Adolph's first proposal, but
he persisted. She said yes sometime after he
upped the enticements to include an
automobile and deposited $8,000 in a Memphis
bank for her to draw upon. Helen insisted
the money was for her trousseau, but Davis
later said it was a loan. She and one of her
sisters traveled to NYC and quickly went
through $5,500 of that balance on a $1,500
chinchilla coat ($42,000 today), $3,000
street gown ($85,000 today), and three
evening gowns for $1,000 ($9,400 EACH
today).
The wedding was planned for Friday, Dec 14,
1906. A week before the wedding, Helen gave
Davis a diamond necklace she said was worth
$11,000 with instructions for him to sell it
if he could. Reading between the lines, I
suspect Davis that saw how quickly she went
through the $8,000, and on what, and raised
a ruckus. She gave up the necklace so that
proceeds from its sale could replenish the
bank account.
Come wedding day, instead of a groom, Helen
got a phone call from his attorney, a man
said to be named Hess, who said Davis had
changed his mind about marrying her due to
her deceit about being divorced from Lee
Dwelle. Fine. said Helen, Give back my
diamond necklace. Davis said he'd return
the necklace when she repaid the $8,000.
Helen had him arrested for theft. One of his
business partners, E. A. Jacobson of 304 W.
71st Street, paid the $5,000 bail.
Helen insisted Davis had known about her
divorce from their earliest
acquaintanceship, and he had not been
troubled by it. Probably factual. Davis's
attorney might have advised him that his
legal position was stronger if the reason
for his breach of promise was her deception
about her marital status. The truth may have
been that Davis got an appraisal on the
necklace and knew it wasn't worth what she
thought it was. Helen consistently
over-evaluated her jewelry by as much as a
hundred percent in some instances, and this
may have been no exception. Davis may also
have reasoned that the $5,500 she'd already
spent was unfortunate but cheaper than a
breach of promise suit or marrying such an
extravagant woman and correctly guessed he
could use the $11,000-necklace-that-was-actually-a-$5,000-necklace
to lure her away from costlier prizes.
At the subsequent hearing, Helen insisted
the $8,000 was a gift, of which she'd
already spent $2,500 — then recited a list
of expenditures totaling $5,500. Helen
claimed Davis had given her many presents,
and all were gifts, not loans. As far as
Helen was concerned, gifts given during
courtship were forever hers. Even if
allowances are made for the times, Helen
consistently saw herself as a child to be
petted and given presents rather than as an
adult entering into a relationship.
At trial, Jenkins revealed she'd been living
with John W. Collins as his wife when she
met Davis. Four years later, Helen had
forgotten her admission of that detail. In
fact, she had several new spins. At court in
1906, she testified that she'd purchased the
necklace at a pawn shop and gave it to Davis
to sell. She also admitted she'd been living
with Collins in Memphis as man and wife when
she met Davis. The pawnshop and selling the
necklace disappeared from the story she told
in 1910. Then she said the diamonds had been
a gift from John Collins that she was
carrying in her handbag, and Davis demanded
that she give it to him for safekeeping.
Davis ended up giving her back the necklace
in exchange for her dropping the grand
larceny charge against him and her promise
to return a couple of hundred love letters
he'd sent to her. Bet he heaved a huge sigh
of relief at such a close call.
† Hough
earned a bigger place in history in 1909 when he
quashed one of two
criminal libel suits brought by the U.S. government
on the part of President Teddy Roosevelt
(who had appointed Hough to the U.S. District Court
for NY's southern district in 1906) against two
newspapers, the New York World and Indianapolis
News. The other suit was quashed by Albert B.
Anderson, another district court judge. The
newspapers had reported there was corruption
involved in the acquisition and building of the
Panama Canal. In an anonymous verdict, the U.S.
Supreme Court, headed by chief justice Edward
Douglas White, upheld Hough's ruling in 1911.
It appears that Hough's ruling was based on a
jurisdictional technicality rather than because
Roosevelt was attempting to punish the press for
disagreeing with his political agenda. Anderson's
commentary was snappier.
‡ Schreyer is recognized for his depictions of
horses. Before heading to Chicago, Ellen Fuld Dwelle
Jenkins was a horse enthusiast.
§ Widower Foultz had followed his father's footsteps
into banking and had been an officer in the First
National Bank in New Castle, PA, for thirty years.
** The Russell family had a summer home on Millsite
Lake and wintered in Yonkers. William had patented
several valves used in the plumbing industry and
operated a company, Steam Specialties, selling
supplies used by steamfitters. They had four
children. Helen would tell newspapers that she'd
tried to affect a reconciliation at a restaurant but
failed because William was too angry and that he
urged her to throw Mary out on the street. They were
still together at William's death in 1930.
†† A bit about the detectives who worked Helen's
robbery:
James McCafferty (1859 – 1911) was chief of
detectives in 1909. A big department hierarchy
change in early 1910 resulted in McCafferty
being demoted to an inspector of the Eleventh
division. He died of leukemia less than a year
later after 24 years on the force. He was
married to a woman named Gertrude and had three
children.
Detective Hyams was probably Louis Hyams (1874 –)
Inspector George W. McClusky (1860-) was reduced
to captain in the 1910 NYPD cataclysm.
Pinkerton man George Dougherty joined the
department as head of detectives from 1910 to
1913. He described McClusky as the finest police
officer he'd ever worked with.
‡‡ Founded in 1875, the Mooney & Boland detective
agency was headed in 1910 by John Boland and William
Sutherland. It boasted of having agents in all
principal cities of America and Europe as well as a
secret railway service. William Sutherland had
purchased the interests of the firm's co-founder
James Mooney at his death in 1891 and served as
general manager of the western division, based in
Chicago, located in the stock exchange building on
LaSalle & Washington.
§§ At his death in 1927, Louis left an estate valued
at over $2.5, with a substantial portion going to
charity. He was a stockbroker known for his
racehorses, including the legendary Hermis.
Bell's large
collection of art and furniture was sold at the Anderson
Galleries in 1921for
$50,000 ($710k today). Architect Duncan was also the
designer of the Ulysses S. Grant's tomb and Soldiers
& Sailors Memorial Arch in NYC.
*** Richard Parr was a long-ago classmate of William
Loeb's, recommended by him to a specially created
position as an investigator of fraud. The case with
the spring and inaccurately weighed sugar was the
high point of his career. Parr was married to Geneva
Clement and had three children. One of his obituary
notices said that he was a personal friend of Teddy
Roosevelt.
††† Newspapers in 1911 did not pick up on a bit of
info that would have added interest to conjectures
about Charles's death (albeit to no gain insofar as
shedding light on the cause). Fourteen years
earlier, Charles Allen's brother-in-law, James
Wallace Knox, who had earned a fortune in
Pittsburgh's window glass industry as a co-founder
of Knox, Kim & Co. (later named Abel, Smith & Co.),
had committed suicide in a hotel room in Kenosha.
Knox had been an important name in horse racing at
one time, campaigning the famous chestnut stallion
racing horse Nutwood from a yearling in 1871 until
1882, but had gambled everything away. He was
married to one of Ella French Allen's sisters,
probably Arrilla / Avilla. It is certain that Ella
French Allen and her siblings were reminded of
Knox's suicide when they learned of Charles's fatal
accident.
Cooper brothers of
Kenosha were Iroquois Theater victims
Kenosha
girl scouts benefited
School teacher Millie
Crocker Iroquois victim
Other discussions you might find interesting
irqwealth irqnocompanions
Story 2927
A note about sourcing. When this
project began, I failed to anticipate the day might come when a
more scholarly approach would be called for. When my
mistake was recognized I faced a decision: go back and spend years creating source lists for every page, or go
forward and try to cover more of the people and circumstances
involved in the disaster. Were I twenty years younger, I'd
have gone back, but in recognition that this project will end when I do, I chose to go forward.
These pages will provide enough information, it is hoped, to
provide subsequent researchers with additional information.
I would like to
hear from you if you have additional info about an Iroquois victim, or find an error,
and you're invited to visit the
comments page to share stories and observations about the Iroquois Theater fire.